Menkaure Essays - Khafra, Menkaure, Nemes, Free Essays, Term Papers

Menkaure Essays - Khafra, Menkaure, Nemes, Free Essays, Term Papers Menkaure The sculpture group of King Menkaure and His Queen is positioned in one of the basic types of Egyptian sculpture the Standing/Striding pose. The figure of Menkaure is rigidly frontal, although his head is slightly turned to the right. His left foot is slightly advanced, however the upper body does not respond to this uneven distribution of weight - there is no tilt in the shoulders, nor a shift in the hips. All movement of the figure is suppressed: his muscular arms hang down his athletic body, they are not flexed at the elbow and do not break through the front contour of his thighs. The body remains wedded to the block of stone from which it was carved. The artist does not remove the dead stone between the arms and torso and most importantly his advanced leg is not carved in the round, which contributes to the solid and majestic appearance of the statue. The Queen assumes the same rigidly frontal posture, however her left leg is less advanced than his, which alludes that she is a subordinate figure to her king in this stance she is just echoing the pharaohs decisive actions. She embraces the pharaoh with her right arm placing her hand around his waist; her left arm is bent at the elbow and covering her stomach rests on the kings left arm. There is a space of about couple of centimeters between the statues that widens towards the base, and which makes Menkaure appear standing independently from his female counterpart. In this frontal, striding forward posture the pharaoh looks confident and in control. The Queen, however, cannot be thought of as an independent statue. First of all, the statue of the king overlaps that of the queen: her right shoulder becomes fused with and overlapped by his left shoulder. Second of all, she has both of her arms around him and not the other way around. Although her appearance conveys the message of majesty and serenity, to me she also appears to be a subordinate figure to that of King Menkaure. Perhaps, this is due to the fact that she stands a step behind him, is being overlapped by his figure and she is the one embracing the pharaoh. The statue group is left unfinished. The most finished parts are the heads, torsos, and kings feet. The queens feet were carved out and left unpolished. The side view of the group offers a great contrast between the rough texture of the stone and its polished one. The back slab goes up to the shoulders of the figures without revealing their backs. It carries a supportive structure for the statues and is not touched up by the artist. This could be indicative of two things: either the group was simply unfinished or was meant to be placed in the niche or stand against a corridor wall. At first sight the facial features of the figures seem to be idealized, but upon closer examination one realizes that they are highly individualized. The face of the pharaoh takes on a squarish shape, his eyes are not deeply set in within their sockets, the nose is short and turned up, the lips are full, the cheeks are protruding, his ears are rather prominent. The queens face is round and fleshy. The almond-shaped eyes, snub-nose, small mouth with full lips and elongated neck seem to be rather more realistic features than idealized. Menkaure is wearing a royal headpiece nemes. It consists of linen head cloth that covers most of his forehead, tucked in behind the ears with pleated folds falling over his shoulders. The queen is wearing a ceremonial wig common among the females. The wig is parted in the middle, tucked in behind the ears and falls down her shoulders. Menkaure is wearing a short royal kilt, and the queen a thin garment that reveals more of her body than it actually conceals, clearly distinguishing the protruding breasts and pubic triangle. The calm and confidence reflecting the royal dignity of this group statue is achieved through compactness and solidity of the composition. The silhouettes are closed they have very few projecting parts. This solid appearance is enhanced by the use of hard stone slate with its natural dark color. The nemes symbol of leadership also emphasizes the royal and divine status of pharaoh. Everything about the statues: the scale (life-size), their solid appearance, the hard stone from which they were executed conveys a feeling of royal dignity.

3 Problematic Parallel Lists

3 Problematic Parallel Lists 3 Problematic Parallel Lists 3 Problematic Parallel Lists By Mark Nichol When listing within a sentence, take care in sentence construction to employ conjunctions and punctuation correctly to achieve proper parallel sentence structure, as discussed in the discussion and revision of each of the following flawed sentences. 1. Smith worked as a chess coach, tutor, and led overnight camping trips. This sentence lacks a verb corresponding with tutor, just as worked is associated with â€Å"as a chess coach† and led pertains to â€Å"overnight camping trips,† as in â€Å"Smith worked as a chess coach, acted as a tutor, and led overnight camping trips.† It appears, however, that the writer intends worked to apply to tutor and â€Å"chess coach† in parallel, with both supported by â€Å"as a,† but the punctuation does not allow this construction. For the statement to be syntactically valid, tutor must be preceded by a conjunction and its own article: â€Å"Smith worked as a chess coach and a tutor and led overnight camping trips.† (If the second a is omitted, the implication is that Smith was a chess coach and a chess tutor; the sentence works this way only if tutor and â€Å"chess coach† are transposed so that tutor is not mistakenly linked to chess.) 2. Regulatory technology aims to make regulatory compliance more integrated, streamlined, and less costly.   The first and third adjectives in the list are provided comparative modifiers, and the implication is that streamlined shares more with integrated, but the comma prevents that association. In order for integrated and streamlined to share more, they must be treated as a phrase separated by and and both commas must be omitted: â€Å"Regulatory technology aims to make regulatory compliance more integrated and streamlined and less costly.† Alternatively, integrated can be assigned its own instance of more: â€Å"Regulatory technology aims to make regulatory compliance more integrated, more streamlined, and less costly.† 3. Firms need to ensure that workflow, queue management, control reporting, exception management, efficient and streamlined processes are in place.   â€Å"Efficient and streamlined processes† is intended to be understood as a factor equivalent to the other four listed beforehand, but the writer has mistaken and for the conjunction that necessarily precedes the final item in the list. Because it is within the final item, another conjunction is required: â€Å"Firms need to ensure that workflow, queue management, control reporting, exception management, and efficient and streamlined processes are in place.† Want to improve your English in five minutes a day? Get a subscription and start receiving our writing tips and exercises daily! Keep learning! Browse the Style category, check our popular posts, or choose a related post below:How Many Tenses in English?50 Latin Phrases You Should KnowPreposition Mistakes #3: Two Idioms